What's in a Location Name?

Now this sort of a norm in sports. Some teams would rather name their team after their state to market to the entire state instead of just a specific city. I think this makes a lot of sense for all of the Minnesota teams, who are all called "Minnesota" and are Minnesota's only team in all 4 sports (and Minneapolis is annoying the say); the Utah Jazz, Utah's only pro team (I don't recognize the MLS); the Tennessee Titans, because it can unite the Memphis/Nashville rivalry; and both teams that are just called "Carolina" because both Carolinas are loaded with a lot of medium sized markets. But there are some other odd uses of this naming technique....let's take a look by sport, discussing each from most to least sensible....

The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim: The dumbest name in all of sports. It all started going downhill in 1965, when they announced their move to Anaheim and a name change to "California" even though the state had 2 other teams at the time. They kept the California name all the way to 1996, when there were 5 teams in the state. When Disney took over the team, they wanted to market the city of Disneyland by correctly calling them "Anaheim," even though that would be like Arlington Rangers or St. Pete Rays in other cities. The city of Anaheim also agreed to renovate their stadium only if "Anaheim" became part of their name. When they were sold again, Los Angeles returned to market to the whole LA area (probably the right move) but stubborn old Anaheim forced them to keep Anaheim in the name....whew...
NFL: There are 5 teams with regional names in football: Patriots, Titans, Vikings, Panthers, and Cardinals, and 3 other noteworthy names. Like I said above, I think the use of Tennessee, Minnesota, Carolina, and Arizona are all good representations because all 4 are representing an entire state(s) and in the case of Tennessee and Carolina, are trying to group 2 or more small markets into 1 large inclusive group. I also don't mind the name New England for the Patriots. Foxborough is actually closer to Providence, Rhode Island, than it is to Boston, and they are the only team in the 6-state New England region. There are 3 interesting teams in this mix too, the Giants, Jets, and Redskins, who all are named after a large city but actually play in an entirely different state than the city they are named for. I think they got this right too, sticking with the traditional "New York" and "Washington" over "New Jersey" or "Landover" or "Maryland." All 3 of these teams originated in the cities they are named for too.

NHL: There are 5 teams in the hockey with a regional name: Devils, Hurricanes, Panthers, Wild, and Avalanche. Minnesota, Colorado, and Carolina work here for reasons I already mentioned, and I think this is an even better use of "New Jersey" since there are already 2 other "New York" teams, and Newark is just an awkward name. The Florida Panthers are the big violators here, joining the NHL and naming themselves after a state when the Tampa Bay Lightning were already playing there, but at least there is an actual animal with that name.
So in the end, my advice to teams looking for a name is that if you're the only team in your state or region and its easier to market than the small to mid size city you play in, then go for the state/regional name. Otherwise, stick to the city or nearest large city you play in. It will be interesting to see if the Sonics go with Oklahoma City or Oklahoma for their name. Just try to avoid calling yourself the Grand Canyon State Coyotes of Glendale.
1 Comments:
I still call the Angels the California Angels, because it saves time trying to remeber what they want to be called.
Post a Comment
<< Home